Smith v. hooey 1969
Web27 Jan 2008 · Download Citation Smith v. Hooey: Underrated But Unfulfilled After the Supreme Court held in 1969 that the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial applied to … WebSMITH v. HOOEY Petitioner was indicted in 1960 on a Texas criminal charge. He was then, and still is, a prisoner in a federal penitentiary. For the next six years he vainly sought to …
Smith v. hooey 1969
Did you know?
WebPETITIONER:Smith. RESPONDENT:Hooey. LOCATION:United States District Court for the District of Columbia. DOCKET NO.: 198. DECIDED BY: Warren Court (1967-1969) LOWER … WebWhile the Supreme Court, in Dickey v. Florida,5 has ruled on the right of an accused to a speedy trial, the real analysis of the subject was ... 3 See, e.g., Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213 (1967) ; Smith v. Hooey, 393 U.S. 374 (1969) ; Dickey v. Florida, 398 U.S. 30 (1970) ; United States v. Marion, -U.S.-, 30 L.Ed.2d (1971). 4 United ...
Web( Smith v. Hooey (1969), 393 U.S. 374, 383, 21 L.Ed.2d 607.) In Smith the State repeatedly rejected over a 6-year period defendant's motions and requests for trial on a State charge of theft while he was a Federal prisoner. WebNorth Carolina (1967), 386 U.S. 213; Smith v. Hooey (1969), 393 U.S. 374; Dickey v. Florida (1970), 398 U.S. 30. A motion to quash, or a motion treated as a motion to quash, is a proper procedure to attack counts of an indictment purporting to commence prosecution of an offense in violation of the constitutional right of defendant to a speedy ...
WebSmith v. Hooey Argued: Dec. 11, 1968. --- Decided: Jan 20, 1969 In Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213, 87 S.Ct. 988, 18 L.Ed.2d 1, this Court held that, by virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial [1] is enforceable against the States as 'one of the most basic rights preserved by our Constitution.' WebDUNCAN v. INDIANA, 393 U.S. 533 (1969) 393 U.S. 533. DUNCAN v. INDIANA. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA. No. 110, Misc. ... The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Indiana for further consideration in light of Smith v. Hooey, ante, p. 374.
WebBefore Smith v. Hooey, the prejudicial effect of denying a speedy trial to a person imprisoned in another jurisdiction and the beneficial effects of the IAD were well understood among scholars and correctional officials.
WebTitle U.S. Reports: Smith v. Hooey, Judge, 393 U.S. 374 (1969). Names Stewart, Potter (Judge) Supreme Court of the United States (Author) Created / Published 1968 Headings - … highest protein w calorie foodWebSmith v. Hooey, 393 U.S. 374 (1969) Smith v. Hooey No. 198 Argued December 11, 1968 Decided January 20, 1969 393 U.S. 374 CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS … highest ps3 firmwareWebCreating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to: highest protein source in the worldWebSmith v. Hooey, 89 S. Ct. 575 (1969). In 1960 Richard M. Smith, while a prisoner in the federal penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas, was indicted in Harris County, Texas on a charge of theft. He responded with a timely request for a trial. After his other efforts to obtain a prompt highest provincial tax in canadaWebSmith v. Hooey, 393 U. S. 374, 393 U. S. 383 (1969). Moreover, prejudice to a defendant caused by delay in bringing him to trial is not confined to the possible . Page 414 U. S. 27 prejudice to his defense in those proceedings. Inordinate delay, "wholly aside from possible prejudice to a defense on the merits, may 'seriously interfere with the ... highest psa level ever recordedWeb27 Jan 2008 · After the Supreme Court held in 1969 that the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial applied to inmates charged with crimes in other jurisdictions, forty-eight … highest ps5 storagehighest psa level